import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
-import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
-import java.util.Arrays;
-import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Optional;
import java.util.ServiceLoader;
-import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.regex.Matcher;
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
return module;
}
}
-
- /**
- * Determines if two augmentation classes or case classes represents same data.
- *
- * <p>
- * Two augmentations or cases could be substituted only if and if:
- * <ul>
- * <li>Both implements same interfaces</li>
- * <li>Both have same children</li>
- * <li>If augmentations: Both have same augmentation target class. Target class was generated for data node in a
- * grouping.</li>
- * <li>If cases: Both are from same choice. Choice class was generated for data node in grouping.</li>
- * </ul>
- *
- * <p>
- * <b>Explanation:</b>
- * Binding Specification reuses classes generated for groupings as part of normal data tree, this classes from
- * grouping could be used at various locations and user may not be aware of it and may use incorrect case or
- * augmentation in particular subtree (via copy constructors, etc).
- *
- * @param potential Class which is potential substitution
- * @param target Class which should be used at particular subtree
- * @return true if and only if classes represents same data.
- * @throws NullPointerException if any argument is {@code null}
- * @deprecated This method is used only mdsal-binding-dom-codec and is scheduled for removal.
- */
- // FIXME: MDSAL-785: this really should live in BindingRuntimeTypes and should not be based on reflection. The only
- // user is binding-dom-codec and the logic could easily be performed on GeneratedType instead. For
- // a particular world this boils down to a matrix, which can be calculated either on-demand or
- // when we create BindingRuntimeTypes. Achieving that will bring us one step closer to being able
- // to have a pre-compiled Binding Runtime.
- @Deprecated(since = "10.0.4", forRemoval = true)
- @SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
- public static boolean isSubstitutionFor(final Class potential, final Class target) {
- Set<Class> subImplemented = new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(potential.getInterfaces()));
- Set<Class> targetImplemented = new HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(target.getInterfaces()));
- if (!subImplemented.equals(targetImplemented)) {
- return false;
- }
- if (Augmentation.class.isAssignableFrom(potential)
- && !BindingReflections.findAugmentationTarget(potential).equals(
- BindingReflections.findAugmentationTarget(target))) {
- return false;
- }
- for (Method potentialMethod : potential.getMethods()) {
- if (Modifier.isStatic(potentialMethod.getModifiers())) {
- // Skip any static methods, as we are not interested in those
- continue;
- }
-
- try {
- Method targetMethod = target.getMethod(potentialMethod.getName(), potentialMethod.getParameterTypes());
- if (!potentialMethod.getReturnType().equals(targetMethod.getReturnType())) {
- return false;
- }
- } catch (NoSuchMethodException e) {
- // Counterpart method is missing, so classes could not be substituted.
- return false;
- } catch (SecurityException e) {
- throw new IllegalStateException("Could not compare methods", e);
- }
- }
- return true;
- }
}