+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2015 Cisco Systems, Inc. and others. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
+ * terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0 which accompanies this distribution,
+ * and is available at http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
+ */
+package org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.util.type;
+
+import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
+import java.util.List;
+import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.LeafSchemaNode;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.TypeDefinition;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.type.BinaryTypeDefinition;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.type.DecimalTypeDefinition;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.type.InstanceIdentifierTypeDefinition;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.type.IntegerTypeDefinition;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.type.LengthConstraint;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.type.PatternConstraint;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.type.StringTypeDefinition;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.api.type.UnsignedIntegerTypeDefinition;
+import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.model.util.ExtendedType;
+
+/**
+ * Compatibility utilities for dealing with differences between the {@link ExtendedType}-driven type representation
+ * versus the representation this package models.
+ *
+ * @deprecated This class is provided strictly for compatibility only. No new users should be introduced, as this class
+ * is scheduled for removal when its two OpenDaylight users, Java Binding v1 and YANG JMX Bindings are
+ * removed.
+ */
+@Deprecated
+public final class CompatUtils {
+ private CompatUtils() {
+ throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * This package's type hierarchy model generates a type which encapsulates the default value and units for leaves.
+ * Java Binding specification is implemented in a way, where it needs to revert this process if the internal
+ * declaration has not restricted the type further -- which is not something available via
+ * {@link TypeDefinition#getBaseType()}.
+ *
+ * Here are the possible scenarios:
+ *
+ * <pre>
+ * leaf foo {
+ * type uint8 {
+ * range 1..2;
+ * }
+ * }
+ * </pre>
+ * The leaf type's schema path does not match the schema path of the leaf. We do NOT want to strip it, as
+ * we need to generate an inner class to hold the restrictions.
+ *
+ * <pre>
+ * leaf foo {
+ * type uint8 {
+ * range 1..2;
+ * }
+ * default 1;
+ * }
+ * </pre>
+ * The leaf type's schema path will match the schema path of the leaf. We do NOT want to strip it, as we need
+ * to generate an inner class to hold the restrictions.
+ *
+ * <pre>
+ * leaf foo {
+ * type uint8;
+ * default 1;
+ * }
+ * </pre>
+ * The leaf type's schema path will match the schema path of the leaf. We DO want to strip it, as we will deal
+ * with the default value ourselves.
+ *
+ * <pre>
+ * leaf foo {
+ * type uint8;
+ * }
+ * </pre>
+ * The leaf type's schema path will not match the schema path of the leaf. We do NOT want to strip it.
+ *
+ * The situation is different for types which do not have a default instantiation in YANG: leafref, enumeration,
+ * identityref, decimal64, bits and union. If these types are defined within this leaf's statement, a base type
+ * will be instantiated. If the leaf defines a default statement, this base type will be visible via getBaseType().
+ *
+ * <pre>
+ * leaf foo {
+ * type decimal64 {
+ * fraction-digits 2;
+ * }
+ * }
+ * </pre>
+ * The leaf type's schema path will not match the schema path of the leaf, and we do not want to strip it, as it
+ * needs to be generated.
+ *
+ * <pre>
+ * leaf foo {
+ * type decimal64 {
+ * fraction-digits 2;
+ * }
+ * default 1;
+ * }
+ * </pre>
+ * The leaf type's schema path will match the schema path of the leaf, and we DO want to strip it.
+ *
+ * @param leaf Leaf for which we are acquiring the type
+ * @return Potentially base type of the leaf type.
+ */
+ @Nonnull public static TypeDefinition<?> compatLeafType(@Nonnull final LeafSchemaNode leaf) {
+ final TypeDefinition<?> leafType = leaf.getType();
+ Preconditions.checkNotNull(leafType);
+
+ if (leafType instanceof ExtendedType) {
+ // Old parser referring to a typedef
+ return leafType;
+ }
+
+ if (!leaf.getPath().equals(leafType.getPath())) {
+ // Old parser semantics, or no new default/units defined for this leaf
+ return leafType;
+ }
+
+ // We are dealing with a type generated for the leaf itself
+ final TypeDefinition<?> baseType = leafType.getBaseType();
+ Preconditions.checkArgument(baseType != null, "Leaf %s has type for leaf, but no base type", leaf);
+
+ if (leaf.getPath().equals(baseType.getPath().getParent())) {
+ // Internal instantiation of a base YANG type (decimal64 and similar)
+ return baseType;
+ }
+
+ // At this point we have dealt with the easy cases. Now we need to perform per-type checking if there are no
+ // new constraints introduced by this type. If there were not, we will return the base type.
+ if (leafType instanceof BinaryTypeDefinition) {
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained((BinaryTypeDefinition) leafType);
+ } else if (leafType instanceof DecimalTypeDefinition) {
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained((DecimalTypeDefinition) leafType);
+ } else if (leafType instanceof InstanceIdentifierTypeDefinition) {
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained((InstanceIdentifierTypeDefinition) leafType);
+ } else if (leafType instanceof IntegerTypeDefinition) {
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained((IntegerTypeDefinition) leafType);
+ } else if (leafType instanceof StringTypeDefinition) {
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained((StringTypeDefinition) leafType);
+ } else if (leafType instanceof UnsignedIntegerTypeDefinition) {
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained((UnsignedIntegerTypeDefinition) leafType);
+ } else {
+ // Other types cannot be constrained, return the base type
+ return baseType;
+ }
+ }
+
+ private static TypeDefinition<?> baseTypeIfNotConstrained(final BinaryTypeDefinition type) {
+ final BinaryTypeDefinition base = type.getBaseType();
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained(type, type.getLengthConstraints(), base, base.getLengthConstraints());
+ }
+
+ private static TypeDefinition<?> baseTypeIfNotConstrained(final DecimalTypeDefinition type) {
+ final DecimalTypeDefinition base = type.getBaseType();
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained(type, type.getRangeConstraints(), base, base.getRangeConstraints());
+ }
+
+ private static TypeDefinition<?> baseTypeIfNotConstrained(final InstanceIdentifierTypeDefinition type) {
+ final InstanceIdentifierTypeDefinition base = type.getBaseType();
+ return type.requireInstance() == base.requireInstance() ? base : type;
+ }
+
+ private static TypeDefinition<?> baseTypeIfNotConstrained(final IntegerTypeDefinition type) {
+ final IntegerTypeDefinition base = type.getBaseType();
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained(type, type.getRangeConstraints(), base, base.getRangeConstraints());
+ }
+
+ private static TypeDefinition<?> baseTypeIfNotConstrained(final StringTypeDefinition type) {
+ final StringTypeDefinition base = type.getBaseType();
+ final List<PatternConstraint> patterns = type.getPatternConstraints();
+ final List<LengthConstraint> lengths = type.getLengthConstraints();
+
+ if ((patterns.isEmpty() || patterns.equals(base.getPatternConstraints())) &&
+ (lengths.isEmpty() || lengths.equals(base.getLengthConstraints()))) {
+ return base;
+ }
+
+ return type;
+ }
+
+ private static TypeDefinition<?> baseTypeIfNotConstrained(final UnsignedIntegerTypeDefinition type) {
+ final UnsignedIntegerTypeDefinition base = type.getBaseType();
+ return baseTypeIfNotConstrained(type, type.getRangeConstraints(), base, base.getRangeConstraints());
+ }
+
+ private static TypeDefinition<?> baseTypeIfNotConstrained(final TypeDefinition<?> type,
+ final List<?> typeConstraints, final TypeDefinition<?> base, final List<?> baseConstraints) {
+ if (typeConstraints.isEmpty() || typeConstraints.equals(baseConstraints)) {
+ return base;
+ }
+ return type;
+ }
+}