Bug 740: Forwardingrules-Manager support for DataChangeListeners

[controller.git] / opendaylight / md-sal / forwardingrules-manager / src / main / java / org / opendaylight / controller / frm / AbstractTransaction.xtend

diff --git a/opendaylight/md-sal/forwardingrules-manager/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/controller/frm/AbstractTransaction.xtend b/opendaylight/md-sal/forwardingrules-manager/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/controller/frm/AbstractTransaction.xtend
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index cb1e90d..0000000
--- a/opendaylight/md-sal/forwardingrules-manager/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/controller/frm/AbstractTransaction.xtend
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Copyright (c) 2014 Cisco Systems, Inc. and others.  All rights reserved.
- *
- * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
- * terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0 which accompanies this distribution,
- * and is available at http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
- */
-package org.opendaylight.controller.frm
-
-import java.util.Collections
-import java.util.HashSet
-import java.util.Map.Entry
-import java.util.Set
-import org.opendaylight.controller.md.sal.common.api.data.DataCommitHandler.DataCommitTransaction
-import org.opendaylight.controller.md.sal.common.api.data.DataModification
-import org.opendaylight.controller.sal.common.util.Rpcs
-import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.binding.DataObject
-import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.binding.InstanceIdentifier
-import org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang.common.RpcError
-
-abstract class AbstractTransaction implements DataCommitTransaction<InstanceIdentifier<?extends DataObject>, DataObject> {
-        
-    @Property
-    val DataModification<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>, DataObject> modification;
-    
-    new(DataModification<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>, DataObject> modification) {
-        _modification = modification;
-    }
-    
-    def void validate() throws IllegalStateException
-    
-    override finish() throws IllegalStateException {
-        validate()
-        callRpcs();
-        return Rpcs.getRpcResult(true, null, Collections.<RpcError>emptySet());     
-    }
-    
-    override getModification() {
-        return _modification;
-    }
-    
-    override rollback() throws IllegalStateException {
-        rollbackRpcs();
-        return Rpcs.getRpcResult(true, null, Collections.<RpcError>emptySet());
-    }
-    
-    def private callRpcs() {
-        val Set<Entry<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>, DataObject>> createdEntries = _modification.getCreatedConfigurationData().entrySet();
-
-        /*
-         * This little dance is because updatedEntries contains both created and modified entries
-         * The reason I created a new HashSet is because the collections we are returned are immutable.
-         */
-        val Set<Entry<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>, DataObject>> updatedEntries = new HashSet<Entry<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>, DataObject>>();
-        updatedEntries.addAll(_modification.getUpdatedConfigurationData().entrySet());
-        updatedEntries.removeAll(createdEntries);
-
-        val Set<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>> removeEntriesInstanceIdentifiers = _modification.getRemovedConfigurationData();
-        for (Entry<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject >, DataObject> entry : createdEntries) {
-            add(entry.key,entry.value);
-        }
-        for (Entry<InstanceIdentifier<?>, DataObject> entry : updatedEntries) {
-                val originalFlow = _modification.originalConfigurationData.get(entry.key);
-                val updatedFlow = entry.value
-                update(entry.key, originalFlow ,updatedFlow);
-        }
-
-        for (InstanceIdentifier<?> instanceId : removeEntriesInstanceIdentifiers ) {
-            val removeValue = _modification.getOriginalConfigurationData.get(instanceId);
-                remove(instanceId,removeValue);
-        }
-    }
-    
-    def void remove(InstanceIdentifier<?> identifier, DataObject remove)
-    
-    def void update(InstanceIdentifier<?> identifier, DataObject original, DataObject update)
-    
-    def void add(InstanceIdentifier<?> identifier, DataObject add)
-    
-    def private rollbackRpcs() {
-        val Set<Entry<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>, DataObject>> createdEntries = _modification.getCreatedConfigurationData().entrySet();
-
-        /*
-         * This little dance is because updatedEntries contains both created and modified entries
-         * The reason I created a new HashSet is because the collections we are returned are immutable.
-         */
-        val Set<Entry<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>, DataObject>> updatedEntries = new HashSet<Entry<InstanceIdentifier<? extends DataObject>, DataObject>>();
-        updatedEntries.addAll(_modification.getUpdatedConfigurationData().entrySet());
-        updatedEntries.removeAll(createdEntries);
-
-        val Set<InstanceIdentifier<? >> removeEntriesInstanceIdentifiers = _modification.getRemovedConfigurationData();
-        for (Entry<InstanceIdentifier<?>, DataObject> entry : createdEntries) {
-            remove(entry.key,entry.value); // because we are rolling back, remove what we would have added.            
-        }
-        for (Entry<InstanceIdentifier<?>, DataObject> entry : updatedEntries) {
-            val originalFlow = _modification.originalConfigurationData.get(entry.key);
-            val updatedFlow = entry.value
-            update(entry.key, updatedFlow ,originalFlow);// because we are rolling back, replace the updated with the original
-        }
-
-        for (InstanceIdentifier<?> instanceId : removeEntriesInstanceIdentifiers ) {
-            val removeValue = _modification.getOriginalConfigurationData.get(instanceId);
-            add(instanceId,removeValue);// because we are rolling back, add what we would have removed.
-        }
-    }    
-}