import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
+import java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadFactory;
+import java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor;
+import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import javassist.ClassPool;
CLASS_POOL);
public static final RuntimeCodeGenerator RPC_GENERATOR = RPC_GENERATOR_IMPL;
public static final NotificationInvokerFactory INVOKER_FACTORY = RPC_GENERATOR_IMPL.getInvokerFactory();
+
+ public static final int CORE_NOTIFICATION_THREADS = 4;
+ public static final int MAX_NOTIFICATION_THREADS = 32;
+ public static final int NOTIFICATION_THREAD_LIFE = 15;
+
private static ListeningExecutorService NOTIFICATION_EXECUTOR = null;
private static ListeningExecutorService COMMIT_EXECUTOR = null;
+ private static ListeningExecutorService CHANGE_EVENT_EXECUTOR = null;
+ /**
+ * @deprecated This method is only used from configuration modules and thus callers of it
+ * should use service injection to make the executor configurable.
+ */
+ @Deprecated
public static synchronized final ListeningExecutorService getDefaultNotificationExecutor() {
if (NOTIFICATION_EXECUTOR == null) {
- NOTIFICATION_EXECUTOR = createNamedExecutor("md-sal-binding-notification-%d");
+ ThreadFactory factory = new ThreadFactoryBuilder().setDaemon(true).setNameFormat("md-sal-binding-notification-%d").build();
+ ExecutorService executor = new ThreadPoolExecutor(CORE_NOTIFICATION_THREADS, MAX_NOTIFICATION_THREADS,
+ NOTIFICATION_THREAD_LIFE, TimeUnit.SECONDS, new LinkedBlockingQueue<Runnable>(), factory);
+ NOTIFICATION_EXECUTOR = MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executor);
}
return NOTIFICATION_EXECUTOR;
}
public static synchronized final ListeningExecutorService getDefaultCommitExecutor() {
if (COMMIT_EXECUTOR == null) {
ThreadFactory factory = new ThreadFactoryBuilder().setDaemon(true).setNameFormat("md-sal-binding-commit-%d").build();
- /*
- * FIXME: this used to be newCacheThreadPool(), but MD-SAL does not have transaction
- * ordering guarantees, which means that using a concurrent threadpool results
- * in application data being committed in random order, potentially resulting
- * in inconsistent data being present. Once proper primitives are introduced,
- * concurrency can be reintroduced.
- */
+ /*
+ * FIXME: this used to be newCacheThreadPool(), but MD-SAL does not have transaction
+ * ordering guarantees, which means that using a concurrent threadpool results
+ * in application data being committed in random order, potentially resulting
+ * in inconsistent data being present. Once proper primitives are introduced,
+ * concurrency can be reintroduced.
+ */
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(factory);
COMMIT_EXECUTOR = MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executor);
}
return COMMIT_EXECUTOR;
}
- private static ListeningExecutorService createNamedExecutor(String format) {
- ThreadFactory factory = new ThreadFactoryBuilder().setDaemon(true).setNameFormat(format).build();
- ExecutorService executor = Executors.newCachedThreadPool(factory);
- return MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executor);
+ public static ExecutorService getDefaultChangeEventExecutor() {
+ if (CHANGE_EVENT_EXECUTOR == null) {
+ ThreadFactory factory = new ThreadFactoryBuilder().setDaemon(true).setNameFormat("md-sal-binding-change-%d").build();
+ /*
+ * FIXME: this used to be newCacheThreadPool(), but MD-SAL does not have transaction
+ * ordering guarantees, which means that using a concurrent threadpool results
+ * in application data being committed in random order, potentially resulting
+ * in inconsistent data being present. Once proper primitives are introduced,
+ * concurrency can be reintroduced.
+ */
+ ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(factory);
+ CHANGE_EVENT_EXECUTOR = MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executor);
+ }
+
+ return CHANGE_EVENT_EXECUTOR;
}
}