Fixed bug when Binding-Aware Data Change Listeners we're not triggered.

[controller.git] / opendaylight / md-sal / sal-binding-broker / src / main / java / org / opendaylight / controller / sal / binding / codegen / impl / SingletonHolder.java

diff --git a/opendaylight/md-sal/sal-binding-broker/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/controller/sal/binding/codegen/impl/SingletonHolder.java b/opendaylight/md-sal/sal-binding-broker/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/controller/sal/binding/codegen/impl/SingletonHolder.java
index 244e3503439612fb7211dd9307c191e73f048120..a0bbb28d9e07624e23ad0afd094c347c27d2fce2 100644 (file)
--- a/opendaylight/md-sal/sal-binding-broker/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/controller/sal/binding/codegen/impl/SingletonHolder.java
+++ b/opendaylight/md-sal/sal-binding-broker/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/controller/sal/binding/codegen/impl/SingletonHolder.java
@@ -9,9 +9,10 @@ package org.opendaylight.controller.sal.binding.codegen.impl;
 
 import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
 import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
-import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
 import java.util.concurrent.ThreadFactory;
 
+import javassist.ClassPool;
+
 import org.opendaylight.controller.sal.binding.codegen.RuntimeCodeGenerator;
 import org.opendaylight.controller.sal.binding.spi.NotificationInvokerFactory;
 
@@ -19,8 +20,6 @@ import com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListeningExecutorService;
 import com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors;
 import com.google.common.util.concurrent.ThreadFactoryBuilder;
 
-import javassist.ClassPool;
-
 public class SingletonHolder {
 
     public static final ClassPool CLASS_POOL = new ClassPool();
@@ -30,6 +29,7 @@ public class SingletonHolder {
     public static final NotificationInvokerFactory INVOKER_FACTORY = RPC_GENERATOR_IMPL.getInvokerFactory();
     private static ListeningExecutorService NOTIFICATION_EXECUTOR = null;
     private static ListeningExecutorService COMMIT_EXECUTOR = null;
+    private static ListeningExecutorService CHANGE_EVENT_EXECUTOR = null;
 
     public static synchronized final ListeningExecutorService getDefaultNotificationExecutor() {
         if (NOTIFICATION_EXECUTOR == null) {
@@ -65,4 +65,21 @@ public class SingletonHolder {
         ExecutorService executor = Executors.newCachedThreadPool(factory);
         return MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executor);
     }
+
+    public static ExecutorService getDefaultChangeEventExecutor() {
+        if (CHANGE_EVENT_EXECUTOR == null) {
+            ThreadFactory factory = new ThreadFactoryBuilder().setDaemon(true).setNameFormat("md-sal-binding-change-%d").build();
+            /*
+             * FIXME: this used to be newCacheThreadPool(), but MD-SAL does not have transaction
+             *        ordering guarantees, which means that using a concurrent threadpool results
+             *        in application data being committed in random order, potentially resulting
+             *        in inconsistent data being present. Once proper primitives are introduced,
+             *        concurrency can be reintroduced.
+             */
+            ExecutorService executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(factory);
+            CHANGE_EVENT_EXECUTOR  = MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executor);
+        }
+
+        return CHANGE_EVENT_EXECUTOR;
+    }
 }